This paper documents the incidence and characteristics of workers’ exposure to AI in Poland compared to other countries and examines the potential barriers that could limit workers’ realized productivity gains. Polish workers are less exposed to AI compared to US and European workers and that the exposure gap is primarily driven by workers’ lower use of computers at work. Second, when looking at workers’ readiness to effectively adopt AI technologies, we find that Polish workers have lower transversal and cognitive skills (assumed to be complementary to AI) than comparator countries and have less opportunities to participate in upskilling and reskilling initiatives. The cross-country skill gap is significantly higher among AI exposed workers. Consistently, Polish workers report substantially higher perceived needs for digital skills training than comparable workers in other countries. However, workers’ awareness of skill gaps is not uniform: it is high among more educated and younger workers, while not significant among older workers. Third, we do not find any systematic relationship between occupational exposure to AI and existing labor shortages in Poland. AI could mitigate existing labor shortages for legal, social and cultural professionals. Finally, the paper provides a framework to guide social protection, skills and employment policies to address AI-driven job displacement and equip workers with skills complementary to AI. We contribute to the literature on measuring workers’ exposure to AI by comparing alternative task-based measures of AI-exposure and validating the AI exposure metrics against self-reported use of generative AI tools at work in Poland.
| Repository name | URI |
|---|---|
| Reproducible Research Repository (World Bank) | https://reproducibility.worldbank.org |
Paper exhibits were reproduced on a computer with the following specifications:
Run time: ~30 minutes
To reproduce the findings in this paper, a replicator must:
main, and run it.Since not all the data is included, the package includes the results produced by replicators. These files can be used to review the results presented in the paper.
The reproducibility package relies on open, limited-access and restricted data. For the source, access type, file location, and citation of each dataset, refer to the Datasets section and the README file.
| Author | Affiliation | |
|---|---|---|
| Maddalena Honorati | World Bank | mhonorati@worldbank.org |
| Piotr Lewandowski | IBS | piotr.lewandowski@ibs.org.pl |
| Karol Madoń | IBS | karol.madon@ibs.org.pl |
2026-11-05
| Location | Code |
|---|---|
| Poland | POL |
The materials in the reproducibility packages are distributed as they were prepared by the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this event do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, the Executive Directors of the World Bank, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the materials included in the reproducibility package.
| Name | URI |
|---|---|
| MIT License | https://opensource.org/license/mit |
| World Bank IGO Rider | https://github.com/worldbank/metadata-editor/blob/main/WB-IGO-RIDER.md |
| Name | Affiliation | |
|---|---|---|
| Maddalena Honorati | World Bank | mhonorati@worldbank.org |
| Reproducibility WBG | World Bank | reproducibility@worldbank.org |
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reproducibility WBG | DECDI | World Bank - Development Impact Department | Verification and preparation of metadata |
2026-11-05
1