Agency—the ability to define one’s own goals and make choices to achieve them—is often measured through questions that capture an individual’s direct involvement in decision-making. Yet not participating in decision-making may not always imply a lack of power. Drawing on the notion of effective power, we conceptualize two forms of this power: effective power by proxy and effective power by influence or persuasion. We then explore indirect ways of pursuing one’s goals when not directly involved in the decision using unique mixed-methods data from multiple members of rural households in Kilifi County, Kenya. Our results indicate that traditional decision-making measures underestimate the agency of some individuals—particularly that of husbands and fathers, who can disproportionately rely on their preferences being met through their effective power by proxy, without bearing the time and cognitive cost of actively engaging in decision-making. The results also indicate that women’s agency varies by marital status and the household composition. Focusing on decisions between married women and their husbands, overlooks the dynamics of intergenerational households where other members, like mothers-in-law or sons, are involved in the decision-making process. We conclude by providing practical recommendations for measuring agency in surveys.
Repository name | URI |
---|---|
Reproducible Research Repository (World Bank) | https://reproducibility.worldbank.org |
Paper exhibits were reproduced in a computer with the following specifications:
• OS: Windows 10 Enterprise
• Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6226R CPU @ 2.90GHz 2.90 GHz (2 processors)
• Memory available: 32 GB
• Software version: Stata version 18 MP
~ 5 minutes.
Since the data is not currently publicly available, the package includes the results produced by replicators. These files can be used to review the results presented in the paper.
All data is temporarily embargoed by the authors (expected to be made public in the future).
Author | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Marya Hillesland | University of Oxford | marya.hillesland@qeh.ox.ac.uk |
Cheryl R. Doss | Tufts University | cheryl.doss@tufts.edu |
Serena Masino | University of Westminster | s.masino@westminster.ac.uk |
Martina Querejeta | National University of La Plata | martinaquerejeta@gmail.com |
Aletheia Donald | World Bank | adonald@worldbank.org |
Greg Seymour | U.S. Census Bureau | gseymour@gmail.com |
Clare Clingain | International Rescue Committee | clare.clingain@rescue.org |
2025-02
Location | Code |
---|---|
Kenya | KEN |
The materials in the reproducibility packages are distributed as they were prepared by the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/the World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this event do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, the Executive Directors of the World Bank, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the materials included in the reproducibility package.
Name | URI |
---|---|
Modified BSD3 | https://opensource.org/license/bsd-3-clause/ |
Name | Affiliation | |
---|---|---|
Marya Hillesland | University of Oxford | marya.hillesland@qeh.ox.ac.uk |
Reproducibility WBG | World Bank | reproducibility@worldbank.org |
Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|---|
Reproducibility WBG | DIME | World Bank - Development Impact Department | Verification and preparation of metadata |
2025-02-10
1