There is a growing literature focusing on measurement error in self-reported data. This paper studies the case of women's agency, a key outcome in economic development, and introduces a simple and cost-effective corrective measure to enhance the reliability of data collection around sensitive topics. The study draws from a survey experiment in rural Guatemala where 1,183 women received the same questions about their agency as part of a phone survey, but the privacy of their responses was varied.Women in the control group answered verbally. The first treatment group used code words to conceal answers from potential bystanders. The second treatment arm used the phone keypad to conceal answers from bystanders and the enumerator alike. The paper finds that women answering under higher levels of privacy report lower levels of agency, by 0.19 standard deviations on an aggregate index. The effects of the two privacy treatments cannot be statistically distinguished. The effect is concentrated among women with higher social standing, and qualitative interviews indicate that agency is socially valued in this setting. Both patterns point to social desirability bias as the most likely explanation for why reported agency responds to privacy.
| Repository name | URI |
|---|---|
| Reproducible Research Repository (World Bank) | https://reproducibility.worldbank.org |
Paper exhibits were reproduced on a computer with the following specifications:
– OS: Windows 11 Enterprise
– Processor: INTEL(R) XEON(R) PLATINUM 8562Y+ 2.80 GHz (2 processors)
– Memory available: 32.0 GB
Run time: ~1 minute
To reproduce the findings in this paper, a replicator must:.
00 - Master Do, and run it.Note: The reproducibility package begins with anonymized extracts of the underlying survey data. Personally identifiable information (name, phone number, exact location) was removed by the authors in a pre-processing step that operates on the raw, PII-containing data. The anonymized datasets can be used to fully reproduce the results in the paper. Additionally, the qualitative evidence in Section 5.3 of the paper (semi-structured phone interviews with 104 participants) were not shared with the reviewers and are not included in the reproducibility package.
The reproducibility package relies on 1 type of data: forthcoming. For the source, access type, file location, and citation of each dataset, refer to the Datasets section and the README file.
| Author | Affiliation | |
|---|---|---|
| Julián Pierino Pedrazzi | Universidad Nacional de La Plata | pedrazzi.julian@gmail.com |
| Jorge M. Agüero | University of Connecticut | jorge.aguero@uconn.edu |
| Viviana M.E. Perego | World Bank | vperego@worldbank.org |
| Javier Romero | World Bank | javierromero@worldbank.org |
2026-10-28
| Location | Code |
|---|---|
| Guatemala | GTM |
The materials in the reproducibility packages are distributed as they were prepared by the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this event do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, the Executive Directors of the World Bank, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the materials included in the reproducibility package.
| Name | URI |
|---|---|
| MIT License | https://opensource.org/license/mit |
| World Bank IGO Rider | https://github.com/worldbank/metadata-editor/blob/main/WB-IGO-RIDER.md |
| Name | Affiliation | |
|---|---|---|
| Julián Pierino Pedrazzi | Universidad Nacional de La Plata | pedrazzi.julian@gmail.com |
| Reproducibility WBG | World Bank | reproducibility@worldbank.org |
| Name | Abbreviation | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reproducibility WBG | DECDI | World Bank - Development Impact Department | Verification and preparation of metadata |
2026-10-28
1